 |
|
|
|
|
The Devil Diverts - Jesus Confronts!
Response from Marilyn Carroll & Rev. McCloskey with Foreword by Rev. Flip Benham • 1/31/2008
This is a response from a reader regarding this picture in the following article:  PARENTS CRITICIZED
This letter is in response to the absolutely horrendous image on the front page of the Jan. 23 Connecticut Post. The parents of 6-year-old Daniel Eldredge, of Monroe, should be reported to the Department of Children and Families and be required to complete a course in parenting skills. To bring a child to an anti-abortion rally which displayed color photographs of aborted fetuses, is a prime example of poor parenting. It is heinous enough that Daniel's parents have made him aware of abortion at an early age, but to take him to a protest with angry people and explicit photographs is beyond comprehension. To his parents: Stop worrying about what others do and think about your own behavior. You protest the cruelty to children by others, yet fail to see that you are also being cruel. A child his age should not be exposed to something of this nature. Kelly Barcello ......................................................................................................................... Responses from Marilyn Carroll TYPICAL PRO-CHOICE DIVERSION Letter to the Editor: Kelly Barcello's letter from Fairfield on "Parents Criticized" is the typical "pro-choice" game of diverting the attention from killing little baby boys and little baby girls to the pro-lifers who are revealing the truth. If she is so worried about parenting skills -- why not report the parents of 10 year olds and 13 year olds that send their kids into the clinic for abortions and cover up the statutory rapes of male predators? Ms. Barcello knows nothing about Daniel or Daniel's parents or why they go to an abortion mill. I personally attended the memorial prayer service that day, no one was angry nor were they protesting. It was a fine group of loving pastors, priests and Christians that cared enough for their tiny neighbors to remember their deaths and repent to God for the sin of abortion in our nation. I thank Jesus for parents like Daniel has, who raise their children to love others and teach them that life isn't all about "me". Ms. Barcello's letter shows how the enemy hates it when the Lord's people expose the lie of what abortion really is. Little Daniel is like little David that stood against Goliath. He has entered the battle at an early age to defend innocent lives. He will grow up to be a mighty man of God. Hopefully the heinous act of ripping babies apart unto death will stop in his lifetime. Marilyn Carroll ......................................................................................................................... Response from Rev. Francis McCloskey
Dear Sir/Madam: In reference to Kelly Barcello's letter about young Daniel Eldridge at the Roe Day observance on Main St., first let me say I was there standing alongside Daniel. I came down from Albany N.Y. and stayed overnight the night before with Daniel and his loving mother and father. Poor deluded Kelly Barcello. Occasionally we meet this same funny thinking from others -- like the dad who came up to me in downtown Baltimore last June while we were out on the streets of Maryland with Jack Ames' FTT tour and complained that his children shouldn't have to see "these bloody pictures". I tell them "come and see and you'll see young children holding these pictures in some instances". It never occurs to the Kelly Barcellos to say to themselves "well if these are so horrendous that I can't have my children looking at them, why am I standing by passively and allowing the horrendous to happen". They don't realize how their passivity is creating the "broken babies" as the children call them. If there were no "broken baby" pictures would Kelly Barcello rush out to join the adults in front of the "we-break-the-baby" factory? Don't bet on it. In truth, the children can handle the photos a lot better than the Kelly Barcellos. And if more truth be exposed, we find the real reason Kelly Barcello does not want the children to see them is that she doesn't want to have to field questions from her or other children like "Mom, why aren't we doing something to save the babies?" Kelly Barcello's protestation is a well-known submerged guilt subterfuge to exonerate the self and pretend she's not part of the problem. Respectfully,
|
|
|
|
